Annette Cody v. Boscovs, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Annette Cody
Defendant: Boscovs, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv01434
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Plaintiff All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Annette Cody(Ferrell, Scott)
August 18, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Boscovs, Inc. answer now due 9/20/2022, filed by Defendant Boscovs, Inc..(Attorney Lynn R Fiorentino added to party Boscovs, Inc. (pty:dft))(Fiorentino, Lynn)
August 15, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Annette Cody, upon Defendant Boscovs, Inc. served on 8/5/2022, answer due 8/26/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynanne Gares, Corporation Service Company, the Registered Agent in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ferrell, Scott)
August 9, 2022 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
August 3, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Boscovs, Inc. (ghap)
August 3, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
August 3, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 3, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap)
August 2, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Annette Cody. (Ferrell, Scott)
August 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Annette Cody, (Ferrell, Scott)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Annette Cody. (Ferrell, Scott)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33741186 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Annette Cody. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Annette Cody(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Annette Cody v. Boscovs, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette Cody
Represented By: Scott J Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boscovs, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas Eugene Hewlett, Jr
Represented By: John S Purcell
Represented By: Lynn R Fiorentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?