John Evans Arek v. American Airlines
| John Evans Arek |
| American Airlines |
| 8:2022cv01439 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant American Airlines. (hr) |
Filing 12
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter that the Request #3 , #9 is GRANTED. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 SEALED UNREDACTED - ATTACHED ARE COPIES OF TAX RETURN, STATEMENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHASE BANK, AND WELL FARGO BANK in support of REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #9 filed re: Statements, #10 (bm) |
| Filing 10 READACTED - ATTACHED ARE COPIES OF TAX RETURN, STATEMENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHASE BANK, AND WELL FARGO BANK in support of REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #9 filed by Plaintiff John Evans Arek. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4). (jp) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff John Evans Arek. (jp) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter that Ruling on Request #3 is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. FURTHER ORDERED that Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Request (form CV-60) reflecting a complete statement of the information requested in each line item. (jp)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff John Evans Arek. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Evans Arek, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant American Airlines. Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff John Evans Arek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: John Evans Arek v. American Airlines | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Evans Arek | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Airlines | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
