Jon Nelson v. Zachary Ramirez et al
Plaintiff: Jon Nelson
Defendant: Zachary Ramirez an individual doing business as Pinehurst Funding and John Doe
Case Number: 8:2022cv01563
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jon Nelson, upon Defendant Zachary Ramirez served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Javitch, Mark)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
August 23, 2022 Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jon Nelson. (Javitch, Mark)
August 23, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et)
August 23, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Zachary Ramirez. (et)
August 23, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
August 23, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
August 23, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et)
August 23, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jon Nelson. (Javitch, Mark)
August 23, 2022 Filing 2 Plaintiff's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jon Nelson, identifying None. (Javitch, Mark)
August 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33858918 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jon Nelson. (Attorney Mark Louis Javitch added to party Jon Nelson(pty:pla))(Javitch, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jon Nelson v. Zachary Ramirez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jon Nelson
Represented By: Mark Louis Javitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary Ramirez an individual doing business as Pinehurst Funding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?