Sean Owens v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Sean Owens |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Educational Credit Management Corporation |
| 8:2022cv01601 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (eva)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Sean Owens. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Sean Owens against Defendants Educational Credit Management Corporation, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Filing fee $ 402 Paid.) (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
