Galicia Ramirez et al v. City of Tustin et al
Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez and Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez |
City of Tustin and Estella Silva |
8:2022cv01619 |
August 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Karen E Scott |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez, Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez, upon Defendant Estella Silva served on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Estella Silva in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Arias, Jesus) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez, Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez, upon Defendant City of Tustin served on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon City of Tustin in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Arias, Jesus) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Tustin, Estella Silva, identifying None Known. (Praet, Bruce) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants City of Tustin, Estella Silva.(Attorney Bruce D Praet added to party City of Tustin(pty:dft), Attorney Bruce D Praet added to party Estella Silva(pty:dft))(Praet, Bruce) |
![]() |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants City of Tustin, Estella Silva. (twdb) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez, Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez. (Arias, Jesus) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request, #4 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiffs Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez, Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez. (Arias, Jesus) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Attorney Jesus Eduardo Arias added to party Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez (pty:pla))(Arias, Jesus) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Kevin Josue Galicia Ramirez, Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez. (Arias, Jesus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33907626 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration by Plaintiff Wendy Galicia CCP 377.32, #2 Declaration By Plaintiff Kevin Galicia CCP 377.32) (Attorney Jesus Eduardo Arias added to party Wendy Lorena Galicia Ramirez (pty:pla))(Arias, Jesus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.