Aximu Yilamujiang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Aximu Yilamujiang
Defendant: ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS, Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU, DAVID MATHEW RADEL, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Case Number: 8:2022cv01636
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-01636 JWH(MRWx). (rn)
October 28, 2022 Filing 13 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Mathew Radel. (Chapman, Ryan)
October 28, 2022 Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ryan Casey Chapman counsel for Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Mathew Radel. Adding Ryan C. Chapman as counsel of record for Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David Radel and Merrick Garland for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David Radel and Merrick Garland. (Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Merrick Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan Casey Chapman added to party David Mathew Radel(pty:dft))(Chapman, Ryan)
September 23, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Proof of Service #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr)
September 20, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Aximu Yilamujiang, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Oscar Ortiz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to USCIS Asylum Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Ali Zahid Sabzwari (Sabzwari, Ali)
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Sabzwari, Ali)
September 8, 2022 Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Aximu Yilamujiang. (Sabzwari, Ali)
September 7, 2022 Filing 7 *CIVIL COVER SHEET* filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 09/02/2022, receipt number 33924788). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabzwari, Ali) Modified on 9/8/2022 (et).
September 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): The complaint is redacted as to the Plaintiff's name. Please note that immigration cases with Nature of Suit 465 are restricted to case participants. Therefore, documents filed by the parties need not be redacted and no further action is required unless the Court directs you to do so. (car)
September 7, 2022 Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Mathew Radel. (car)
September 7, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C) (car)
September 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Sabzwari, Ali)
September 2, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Aximu Yilamujiang. (Sabzwari, Ali)
September 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33924788 - Fee: $402. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Ali Zahid Sabzwari added to party Aximu Yilamujiang (pty:pla))(Sabzwari, Ali)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aximu Yilamujiang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aximu Yilamujiang
Represented By: Ali Zahid Sabzwari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID MATHEW RADEL
Represented By: Ryan Casey Chapman
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Ryan Casey Chapman
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Ryan Casey Chapman
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Ryan Casey Chapman
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?