Michael C. Keo v. Won Koo Kang et al
Michael C. Keo |
Won Koo Kang and Im Soon Kang |
8:2022cv01643 |
September 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Angilbert Nobel Loho counsel for Defendants Im Soon Kang, Won Koo Kang. Adding Minely Grigorian as counsel of record for WON KOO KANG, in his individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST; IM SOON KANG, in her individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants WON KOO KANG, in his individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST; IM SOON KANG, in her individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST. (Loho, Angilbert) |
Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Angilbert Nobel Loho counsel for Defendants Im Soon Kang, Won Koo Kang. Filed by Defendants WON KOO KANG, in his individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST; IM SOON KANG, in her individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST. (Attorney Angilbert Nobel Loho added to party Im Soon Kang(pty:dft), Attorney Angilbert Nobel Loho added to party Won Koo Kang(pty:dft))(Loho, Angilbert) |
Filing 19 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than January 17, 2023. (es) |
Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. In light of the Applications to Stay Case and Early Mediation #11 #12 #15 #16 , the Court sua sponte extends Defendants' deadline to file an Answer to October 21, 2022, to allow time for filing of opposition (if any) to said Applications. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for final disposition (et) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Won Koo Kang. (Grigorian, Minely) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Im Soon Kang. (Grigorian, Minely) |
Filing 14 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Grigorian, Minely) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. In light of the applications for stay #11 #12 , the Court sua sponte extends Defendants deadline to file an Answer to October 14, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Won Koo Kang. (Attorney Minely Grigorian added to party Won Koo Kang(pty:dft)) (Grigorian, Minely) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Im Soon Kang. (Attorney Minely Grigorian added to party Im Soon Kang(pty:dft)) (Grigorian, Minely) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael C. Keo, upon Defendant Im Soon Kang served on 9/16/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon IM SOON KANG, in her individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANG FAMILY TRUST in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael C. Keo, upon Defendant Won Koo Kang served on 9/16/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon WON KOO KANG, in his individual capacity and as Trustee of the KANGFAMILY TRUST in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Michael C. Keo. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Plaintiff is directed to serve three documents (the "ADA Packet") on the Defendant(s): (1) this Notice to Parties; (2) the attached Application for Stay and Early Mediation; and (3) the attached [Proposed] Order Granting Application for Stay and Early Mediation. [See Order for further details.] (es) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Im Soon Kang, Won Koo Kang. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO, (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33930855 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party MICHAEL C. KEO(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.