St. Joseph Hospital of Orange et al v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc. et al
| St. Joseph Hospital of Orange, St. Jude Hospital, Inc. dba St. Jude Medical Center, St. Mary Medical Center dba Providence St. Mary Medical Center, St. Joseph Hospital of Orange doing business as Providence St. Joseph Hospital Orange, St. Jude Hospital, Inc. doing business as St. Jude Medical Center and St. Mary Medical Center doing business as Providence St. Mary Medical Center |
| Dependable Highway Express, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv01647 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Dependable Highway Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Whitman, Todd) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-01647-JWH-(ADSx). (dve)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge John D. Early to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-01647 JVS(ADSx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Dependable Highway Express, Inc., (Whitman, Todd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Timothy J. Fitzgerald. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Christine M. Cooper. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Dependable Highway Express, Inc., Does., filed by Plaintiff St. Mary Medical Center, St. Joseph Hospital of Orange, St. Jude Hospital, Inc.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/01/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff St. Mary Medical Center, St. Joseph Hospital of Orange, St. Jude Hospital, Inc., upon Defendant Dependable Highway Express, Inc. served on 8/5/2022. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned.[FILED IN STATE COURT 08/08/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBIT 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Dependable Highway Express, Inc.. (Whitman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2022-01272713-CU-BC-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-33935456 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Dependable Highway Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of CMC, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Summons, #5 Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Todd E Whitman added to party Dependable Highway Express, Inc.(pty:dft))(Whitman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
