8 Lane Investment, Inc v. GenTech Scientific, Inc. et al
8 Lane Investment, Inc doing business as VRX Labs |
GenTech Scientific, Inc., John Doe I and John Doe II |
8:2022cv01686 |
September 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Fred W Slaughter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GENTECH SCIENTIFIC, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 12(b)(6) Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404 #14 filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc, (Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc., identifying GenTech Scientific, Inc.. (Canale, Kathryn) |
Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 USC 1404 filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404 filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/1/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Motion, #2 Declaration of Kathryn Canale, #3 Declaration of Clair D. Bragg, #4 Exhibit A to Bragg Decl., #5 Exhibit B to Bragg Decl., #6 Proposed Order) (Canale, Kathryn) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING The Parties' Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint #11 ; ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause #10 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter the following: (1) The time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned matter is EXTENDED to and including 10/26/2022. (2) The Order to Show Cause issued by the court on 10/14/2022 #10 , is hereby DISCHARGED. (jp) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc Court's Order to Show Cause (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than 10/21/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc, upon Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc. served on 9/21/2022, answer due 10/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon GenTech Scientific, Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc. (car) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Vethan, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 09/14/2022, receipt number 33983376), filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Attorney Charles M R Vethan added to party 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs(pty:pla))(Vethan, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.