8 Lane Investment, Inc v. GenTech Scientific, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: 8 Lane Investment, Inc doing business as VRX Labs
Defendant: GenTech Scientific, Inc., John Doe I and John Doe II
Case Number: 8:2022cv01686
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2022 Filing 20 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GENTECH SCIENTIFIC, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 12(b)(6) Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404 #14 filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vethan, Charles)
October 28, 2022 Filing 19 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc, (Vethan, Charles)
October 28, 2022 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc., identifying GenTech Scientific, Inc.. (Canale, Kathryn)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
October 28, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 USC 1404 filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
October 28, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car)
October 26, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), or alternatively, to dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(3), or transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404 filed by Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/1/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice of Motion, #2 Declaration of Kathryn Canale, #3 Declaration of Clair D. Bragg, #4 Exhibit A to Bragg Decl., #5 Exhibit B to Bragg Decl., #6 Proposed Order) (Canale, Kathryn)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING The Parties' Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint #11 ; ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause #10 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter the following: (1) The time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned matter is EXTENDED to and including 10/26/2022. (2) The Order to Show Cause issued by the court on 10/14/2022 #10 , is hereby DISCHARGED. (jp)
October 21, 2022 Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc Court's Order to Show Cause (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Vethan, Charles)
October 21, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vethan, Charles)
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than 10/21/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp)
September 26, 2022 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc, upon Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc. served on 9/21/2022, answer due 10/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon GenTech Scientific, Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Vethan, Charles)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
September 16, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant GenTech Scientific, Inc. (car)
September 16, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
September 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
September 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car)
September 15, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Vethan, Charles)
September 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Vethan, Charles)
September 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 09/14/2022, receipt number 33983376), filed by plaintiff 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Attorney Charles M R Vethan added to party 8 Lane Investment, Inc d/b/a VRX Labs(pty:pla))(Vethan, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 8 Lane Investment, Inc v. GenTech Scientific, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 8 Lane Investment, Inc doing business as VRX Labs
Represented By: Charles M R Vethan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GenTech Scientific, Inc.
Represented By: Kathryn Porter Canale
Represented By: Mark I Melo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?