Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc.
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Everett Financial Inc. a Texas corporation doing business as Supreme Lending |
| 8:2022cv01692 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Contract: Other |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1818 FDIC |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Colin Stewart Duffy on behalf of Defendant Everett Financial Inc. (Attorney Colin Stewart Duffy added to party Everett Financial Inc.(pty:dft))(Duffy, Colin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Everett Financial Inc., (Kenney, Austin) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant Everett Financial Inc..(Attorney Austin Benjamin Kenney added to party Everett Financial Inc.(pty:dft))(Kenney, Austin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Proof of Service #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is incomplete. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, upon Defendant Everett Financial Inc. served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lai Saevang, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Levin, Paul) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Granting #7 Non-Resident Attorney John V. Church APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of behalf of Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, designating Paul A. Levin as local counsel. (et)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney John V. Church to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Not Required for US Government Attorney) filed by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Levin, Paul) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John V Church on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Everett Financial Inc. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank. (Levin, Paul) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank. (Levin, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Paul Andrew Levin added to party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank(pty:pla))(Levin, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Everett Financial Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Paul Andrew Levin |
| Represented By: | Lauren M Gibbs |
| Represented By: | John V. Church |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Everett Financial Inc. a Texas corporation doing business as Supreme Lending | |
| Represented By: | Austin Benjamin Kenney |
| Represented By: | Colin Stewart Duffy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
