Hanjun Cho v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Hanjun Cho
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Trans Union LLC
Case Number: 8:2022cv01833
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc., identifying Encore Capital Group, Inc.. (Attorney John A Kelly added to party Midland Credit Management, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kelly, John)
October 31, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc..(Attorney Thomas F Landers, Jr added to party Midland Credit Management, Inc.(pty:dft))(Landers, Thomas)
October 6, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Loker, Matthew)
October 6, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Trans Union LLC. (ghap)
October 6, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (ghap)
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hanjun Cho, (Loker, Matthew)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hanjun Cho. (Loker, Matthew)
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hanjun Cho. (Loker, Matthew)
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hanjun Cho. (Loker, Matthew)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34114250 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Hanjun Cho. (Attorney Matthew Michael Loker added to party Hanjun Cho(pty:pla))(Loker, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanjun Cho v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hanjun Cho
Represented By: Matthew Michael Loker
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: John A Kelly
Represented By: Thomas F Landers, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trans Union LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?