Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc.
| Bell Semiconductor, LLC |
| Omnivision Technologies, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv01840 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Omnivision Technologies, Inc. answer now due 1/4/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc..(Gants, Connor) |
| Filing 28 Notice of Interested Parties filed by defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc.. (Gants, Connor) |
| Filing 27 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc. identifying Will Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Gants, Connor) |
| Filing 26 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Connor T. Gants counsel for Defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc.. Adding Connor T. Gants as counsel of record for OmniVision Technologies, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant OmniVision Technologies, Inc.. (Attorney Connor T. Gants added to party Omnivision Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gants, Connor) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC, upon Defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc. served on 11/14/2022, answer due 12/5/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra Lau, registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Block, Alan) |
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Discharging Order to Show Cause Why Applications of Non-Resident Attorneys To Appear Pro Hac Vice Should Not Be Denied Under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: re: Response #23 . The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Response to its Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff's pending Pro Hac Vice Applications are hereby deemed WITHDRAWN, and the Order to Show Cause is hereby DISCHARGED. (es)
|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLCto Order to Show Cause,, #18 (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 22 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David Sochia counsel for Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. David Sochia is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Sochia, David) |
| Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ashley Moore counsel for Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Ashley Moore is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Moore, Ashley) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Richard A. Kamprath counsel for Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Richard A. Kamprath is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Kamprath, Richard) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alexandra Easley counsel for Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Alexandra Easley is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Easley, Alexandra) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPLICATIONS OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEYS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE SHOULD NOT BE DENIED UNDER LOCAL RULE 83-2.1.3.2(c) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Bell Semiconductor is ORDERED, on or before November 4, 2022, to show cause in writing why-unlike the attorney in Kerstein-Alexandra Easley, Richard Kamprath, Ashley Moore, and David Sochia are not "regularly engaged in business, profession, or other similar activities in California" and should not have their Applications to Appear Pro Hac Vice denied under Local Rule 83-2.1.3.2(c). [See Order for further details.] (es)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Kamprath to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34154368) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Other error(s) with document(s): Failed to list Texas State Bar where attorney is licensed. (lt) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David Sochia to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34154490) filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ashley Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34154436) filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Kamprath to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34154368) filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alexandra Easley to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34154302) filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Alexandra Easley. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Kamprath. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ashley N. Moore. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney David Sochia. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paul Richter. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Omnivision Technologies, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC identifying Bell Semiconductor, LLC; Hilco Patent Acquistions 56, LLC; Hilco IP Merchant Capital, LLC; Hilco, Inc.; Vulcan Ventures, Inc.; CDPQ Investments (U.S.) Inc.; KLIM AIV I, L.P. as Corporate Parent. (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Block, Alan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34121201 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Alan P. Block added to party Bell Semiconductor, LLC(pty:pla))(Block, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
