Camille Ouellette et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
Plaintiff: CAMILLE OUELLETTE and KEVIN GIFFORD
Defendant: U.S. Department of State and U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL MONTREAL
Case Number: 8:2022cv01845
Filed: October 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: John D Early
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order by Judge David O. Carter: Approving Stipulation of Dismissal #12 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action, to include each claim and count asserted by Plaintiffs against Defendants, shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees, costs, and expenses. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
December 28, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendants U.S. Consulate General Montreal, U.S. Department of State. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Choi, Erin)
November 10, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to U.S. Consulate General Montreal answer now due 1/11/2023; U.S. Department of State answer now due 1/11/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants U.S. Consulate General Montreal; U.S. Department of State.(Attorney Erin Choi added to party U.S. Consulate General Montreal(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Choi added to party U.S. Department of State(pty:dft))(Choi, Erin)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by District Judge David O. Carter granting APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Zachary R. New to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs KEVIN GIFFORD, CAMILLE OUELLETTE #5 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ts) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 12, 2022 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
October 12, 2022 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants U.S. Consulate General Montreal, U.S. Department of State, Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States, United States Attorney's Office. (car)
October 12, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 12, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car)
October 10, 2022 Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Zachary R. New to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs KEVIN GIFFORD, CAMILLE OUELLETTE (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34124130) filed by plaintiff KEVIN GIFFORD, CAMILLE OUELLETTE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Emerick, Scott)
October 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying none known at this time. (Emerick, Scott)
October 10, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs KEVIN GIFFORD, CAMILLE OUELLETTE. (Emerick, Scott)
October 10, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff KEVIN GIFFORD, CAMILLE OUELLETTE. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons Defedant Consulate, #2 Supplement Summons Atty. Gen., #3 Supplement Summons Civil Process Clerk)(Emerick, Scott)
October 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34124086 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff CAMILLE OUELLETTE, KEVIN GIFFORD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NVC Case Creation, #2 Exhibit Immigrant Visa Interview Notice, #3 Exhibit Submission of DS5535) (Attorney Scott A Emerick added to party KEVIN GIFFORD(pty:pla), Attorney Scott A Emerick added to party CAMILLE OUELLETTE(pty:pla))(Emerick, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Camille Ouellette et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAMILLE OUELLETTE
Represented By: Scott A Emerick
Represented By: Zachary R. New
Represented By: Scott A. Emerick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEVIN GIFFORD
Represented By: Scott A Emerick
Represented By: Zachary R. New
Represented By: Scott A. Emerick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of State
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Erin Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL MONTREAL
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Erin Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?