Madaluxe Group, LLC v. Dahlen Kok Han Wee
Plaintiff: MADALUXE GROUP, LLC
Defendant: DAHLEN KOK HAN WEE
Case Number: 8:2022cv01926
Filed: October 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 504 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Dahlen Kok Han Wee answer now due 1/13/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Dahlen Kok Han Wee.(Sadat, Arash)
December 7, 2022 Filing 17 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge John W. Holcomb: The Court has received and reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff [ECF No. 16]. The Show Cause Hearing set for 12/13/2022 at 9:00 AM is CONTINUED to 12/20/2022 at 9:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. The parties are DIRECTED to appear in person in Courtroom 9D, on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 411 W. Fourth Street Santa Ana, CA 92701. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 6, 2022 Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Madaluxe Group, LLCto Text Only Scheduling Notice, 15 (Holbrow, Willmore)
December 6, 2022 Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge John W. Holcomb Show Cause Hearing set for 12/13/2022 09:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. The parties are DIRECTED to appear in person in Courtroom 9D, on the 9th Floor of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 411 W. Fourth Street Santa Ana, CA 92701. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cla) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb: On October 21, 2022, A Notice to Counsel Re: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements was issued, directing counsel to file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days [ECF No. 9]. To date, no such form has been filed. Counsel is DIRECTED to comply with the Notice by November 29, 2022. The Courts SETS an Order to Show Cause Hearing for December 9, 2022, at 9:00 a.m., in person. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 14, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Dahlen Kok Han Wee answer now due 12/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Dahlen Kok Han Wee.(Sadat, Arash)
November 14, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Arash Sadat on behalf of Defendant Dahlen Kok Han Wee (Attorney Arash Sadat added to party Dahlen Kok Han Wee(pty:dft))(Sadat, Arash)
November 8, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Madaluxe Group, LLC, upon Defendant Dahlen Kok Han Wee served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dahlen Kok Han Wee, Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holbrow, Willmore)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for further details) (yl)
October 21, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (car)
October 21, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Dahlen Kok Han Wee. (car)
October 21, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 21, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 21, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car)
October 20, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MADALUXE GROUP, LLC, (Holbrow, Willmore)
October 20, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MADALUXE GROUP, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
October 20, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MADALUXE GROUP, LLC. (Holbrow, Willmore)
October 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34191444 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff MADALUXE GROUP, LLC. (Attorney Willmore F. Holbrow, III added to party MADALUXE GROUP, LLC(pty:pla))(Holbrow, Willmore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madaluxe Group, LLC v. Dahlen Kok Han Wee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MADALUXE GROUP, LLC
Represented By: Willmore F. Holbrow, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAHLEN KOK HAN WEE
Represented By: Arash Sadat
Represented By: Camron Ali Dowlatshahi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?