John Anthony Terrones v. United States of America
| John Anthony Terrones |
| United States of America |
| 8:2022cv01947 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 #5 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court has read and considered respondent/plaintiff United States of Americas ex parte application for an extension of time to respond to petitioner/defendant JOHN ANTHONY TERRONES's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court, finding good cause exists, hereby grants the application and orders respondent/plaintiff to file its response no later than January 6, 2023. (rolm)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Respondent United States of America, re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to 2255 Motion #5 served on 11/23/2022. (Douglas, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to 2255 Motion filed by Respondent United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Douglas, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court orders that the Respondent file a response no later than four weeks after the entry of this Order. Thereafter, the Petitioner shall have three weeks to file a reply. The matter will then be under submission, and the Court will set a hearing only if indicated. (jp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney Elizabeth S.P. Douglas on behalf of Respondent United States of America. Assistant United States Attorney Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney SA-CR terminated. (Douglas, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (sh) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 8:19-cr-00194-JLS, filed by Petitioner John Anthony Terrones. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: John Anthony Terrones v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Anthony Terrones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney SA-CR |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Suilin Pamela Douglas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
