Mohsen Parsa v. Instagram, Inc. et al
| Mohsen Parsa |
| Instagram, LLC, Twitter, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv01993 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa(Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 24 Notice Amended Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
Filing 23
ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE DATE by Judge John W. Holcomb. The Parties have stipulated, subject to this Courts approval, that Plaintiff shall have until December 15, 2022, to file an amended complaint and that Defendants Twitter, Inc., Instagram, LLC, and Meta Platforms, Inc., shall have until January 13, 2023, to file a response to the operative complaint. Pursuant to Parties' stipulation, and good cause so appearing: IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michelle Nicole Molner on behalf of Defendants Instagram, LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Attorney Michelle Nicole Molner added to party Instagram, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Michelle Nicole Molner added to party Meta Platforms, Inc.(pty:dft))(Molner, Michelle) |
| Filing 21 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Stipulation Re Amended Complaint and Defendants' Response Date)(Patchen, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 20
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jacob Marcus Heath on behalf of Defendants Instagram, LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc. (Attorney Jacob Marcus Heath added to party Instagram, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Jacob Marcus Heath added to party Meta Platforms, Inc.(pty:dft))(Heath, Jacob) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order,, #9 filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge John W. Holcomb: The Court has received Plaintiff's Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order for Setting Hearing for Preliminary Injunction (the Application) [ECF No. 9]. The Court hereby DIRECTS Defendants to file their respective responses to the Application no later than 12:00 noon on Monday, November 7, 2022. The matter shall be deemed under submission after briefing is complete. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 16 SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT TWITTER, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER opposition re: First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER FOR SETTING HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS FROM ALLOWING THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRANS GOVERNMENT, ITS STATE SPONSOR #9 filed by Defendant Twitter, Inc.. (Attorney Jonathan A Patchen added to party Twitter, Inc.(pty:dft))(Patchen, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Jenn Bautista filed by Plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Jenn Bautista filed by Plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa, identifying Twitter, Inc.; Instagram LLC; Meta Platforms, Inc.; Islamic Republic of Iran Government Officials. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Bruce Anderson filed by Plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 9 [WITHDRAWN AS OF 11-3-22] First APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER FOR SETTING HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS FROM ALLOWING THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRANS GOVERNMENT, ITS STATE SPONSORED MEDIA OUTLETS, AND VARIOUS ISLAMIC REPUBLIC GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM DISSEMINATING DISINFORMATION ON DEFENDANTS SOCIAL MEDIA INTERNET PLATFORMS filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. Application set for hearing on 11/4/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Mohsen Parsa in Support of TRO, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Parsa, Mohsen) Modified on 11/3/2022 (yl). |
| Filing 8 First REQUEST to Substitute attorney Mohsen Parsa filed by plaintiff Mohsen Parsa. (Attorney Mohsen Parsa added to party Mohsen Parsa(pty:pla)) (Parsa, Mohsen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events - Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings. Pro Se litigants cannot use their access as an attorney to file a matter as a pro se litigant. Pro Se litigants must seek approval from the court to e-file. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. Summons should be e-filed separately, the correct event is located under Civil Events Service Documents Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints and select Summons Request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:22-cv-01993-JWH-ADSx. (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34239559 - Fee: $402, filed by Pro se Mohsen Parsa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney Mohsen Parsa added to party Mohsen Parsa(pty:bkmov))(Parsa, Mohsen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
