Leila Balouch v. Chip Laitinen et al
Plaintiff: Leila Balouch
Defendant: Chip Laitinen and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 8:2022cv02118
Filed: November 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
December 9, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leila Balouch, upon Defendant Antony Blinken served on 12/5/2022, answer due 2/3/2023; Chip Laitinen served on 12/5/2022, answer due 2/3/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Richard Chidress, Legal Assistant. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Ellie Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Chip Laitinen, Antony Blinken. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua)
November 23, 2022 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen, Merrick Garland, E. Martin Estrada (sh)
November 23, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
November 23, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh)
November 22, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leila Balouch. (Goldstein, Joshua)
November 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leila Balouch, (Goldstein, Joshua)
November 22, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leila Balouch. (Goldstein, Joshua)
November 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34366383 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Leila Balouch. (Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Leila Balouch(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leila Balouch v. Chip Laitinen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leila Balouch
Represented By: Joshua L. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chip Laitinen
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?