Brian Stanko v. Brianna Stanko et al
| Brian Stanko |
| Brianna Stanko, eBeauty Sales LLC dba Premier Look, Brianna Beauty LLC dba Skin Truth, eBeauty Sales LLC as nominal defendant doing business as Premier Look, Skin Truth and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv02151 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp)
|
|
Filing 17
TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court - Central Justice Center. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - Central Justice Center at Santa Ana. Case number: 30-2021-01223255-CU-FR-CJC. (jp)
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTES ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to California Superior Court, County of Orange, and DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Fees and Costs #11 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Tthe court GRANTS the Motion and REMANDS thisaction to California Superior Court, County of Orange. Further, the court DENIES Plaintiff'srequest for fees and costs. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than 3/9/2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to file a joint report (FRCP 26). (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #11 . The court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 2, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED/OFF CALENDAR and the court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 13
Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand In Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #11 Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Brianna Stanko. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Daniel L. Hitzke in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration Declaration of Barry Wroobel in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, #3 Declaration Declaration of Brianna Stanko in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Hitzke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Stanko, (Lanza, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Brian Stanko. Motion set for hearing on 2/2/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian Stanko in Support of Motion to Remand to State Court, #2 Declaration of Anthony Lanza in Support of Motion to Remand to State Court) (Attorney Anthony L. Lanza added to party Brian Stanko(pty:pla)) (Lanza, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 2/9/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge John F. Walter, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 8:20-cv-00779-JFW-(ADSx) (dve)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Skin Truth, Brianna Stanko, (Hitzke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (jtil)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Brian Stanko in Orange County Superior Court on 5/13/2022, attached as Exhibit D. (jtil)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Brianna Stanko in Orange County Superior Court on 7/13/2022, attached as Exhibit E. (jtil)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDED ANSWER filed by Defendant Brianna Stanko in Orange County Superior Court on 11/1/2022, attached as Exhibit F. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Brianna Stanko. (Hitzke, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Orange - Central Justice Center, case number 30-2021-01223255-CU-FR-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-34393295 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Brianna Stanko. (Attorney Daniel Lee Hitzke added to party Brianna Stanko(pty:dft))(Hitzke, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
