GS Holistic, LLC v. Sandy Smoke, Inc et al
GS Holistic, LLC |
Sandy Smoke, Inc doing business as High Cloud Smoke Shop and Talal N Khalil |
8:2022cv02173 |
December 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #3 filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, identifying Chris Folkerts, GS Holistic, LLC, Leon Law LLP, Tomas Carlos Leon, SANDY SMOKE, INC d/b/a HIGH CLOUD SMOKE SHOP and TALAL N KHALIL. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34411304 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Attorney Tomas Carlos Leon added to party GS Holistic, LLC(pty:pla))(Leon, Tomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.