Sheila O'Leary Thorkelson v. Target Corporation et al
Plaintiff: SHEILA O'LEARY-THORKELSON and Sheila OLeary Thorkelson
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv02177
Filed: December 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Miscellaneous Document #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Jury Demand (Pretrial/trial documents). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb)
January 20, 2023 Filing 11 Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Sheila OLeary Thorkelson (Easton, Travis)
January 19, 2023 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Halm, David)
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:22-cv-02177-DOC-DFM. (dta)
December 19, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on February 2, 2023. (rrp)
December 19, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge John D. Early to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-02177 CJC(DFMx). (rn)
December 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh)
December 2, 2022 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Target Corporation, upon Defendant Target Corporation served on 11/3/2022. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. [FILED IN STATE COURT 11/15/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
December 2, 2022 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Target Corporation., filed by Plaintiff Sheila OLeary Thorkelson.[FILED IN STATE COURT 09/29/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
December 2, 2022 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Target Corporation.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENTNO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh)
December 2, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Halm, David)
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION.. (Halm, David)
December 2, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, (Halm, David)
December 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2022-01284038-CU-PO-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-34415779 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney David G Halm added to party TARGET CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Halm, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheila O'Leary Thorkelson v. Target Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHEILA O'LEARY-THORKELSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila OLeary Thorkelson
Represented By: W. Douglas Easton
Represented By: Travis Robert Easton
Represented By: Matthew D Easton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By: David G Halm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?