Santos Ovalle v. Orange County Sheriff Department et al
| Santos Ovalle |
| Orange County Sheriff Department, Deputy Martinez, Doctor Holstein, Doctor Shultz, Doctor Vunna, Captain Peak, Deputy Romeo, Two John Doe Deputies, Department Orange County Sheriff and Deputy Sheriff Martinez |
| 8:2022cv02198 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Karen E Scott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Dismissing Complaint (Dkt. 1) with Leave to Amend by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. By February 21, 2023, Plaintiff must do one of the following things: [See document for further information.] (es)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #8 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request is not able to pay the filing fees. The Request is GRANTED. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (es) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: The request also does not provide an answer to Question 1(b) regarding past employment. Without that information, the Court cannot determine whether Plaintiff is indigent. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff must file a signed complaint. Else, the unsigned complaint on file with the Court will be stricken, and this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 11(a), 41(b). (lom)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Court finds that the party who filed the Request. has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: The request is unsigned in violation of Local Rules 5-4.3.4 and 11-1. The filing may be stricken under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). The request also does not provide a complete answer to a question regarding Plaintiff's tax returns. IfPlaintiff is not a prisoner within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1915(h), he should complete, sign, and file a renewed request using Form CV-60. Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following: Plaintiff must file a signed complaint. Else, the unsigned complaint on file with the Court will be stricken, and this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 11(a), 41(b). (lc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (sh) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (et) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (sh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Department Orange County Sheriff, Deputy Martinez, Holstein, Orange County Sheriff Department, Peak, Romeo, Shultz, Two John Doe Deputies, Vunna pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott., filed by Plaintiff Santos Ovalle. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
