Giovanni James v. Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC et al
Giovanni James |
Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC, Red Oak Capital Group, LLC, Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC, Red Oak Capital GP, LLC, Insperity PEO Services, L.P., Gary Bechtel and DOES inclusive |
8:2022cv02202 |
December 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Fred W Slaughter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Giovanni James. Dismissal is without prejudice. (King, Robert) |
Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , PRETRIAL STIPULATION regarding Exhibits filed by Defendants Gary Bechtel, Insperity PEO Services, L.P., Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC, Red Oak Capital GP, LLC, Red Oak Capital Group, LLC, Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC.(Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Gary Bechtel(pty:dft), Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Insperity PEO Services, L.P.(pty:dft), Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Red Oak Capital GP, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Red Oak Capital Group, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mark J Jacobs added to party Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC(pty:dft))(Jacobs, Mark) |
Filing 17 REQUEST to Dismiss Defendant Red Oak Capital Group, LLC filed by Plaintiff Giovanni James. (King, Robert) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Giovanni James, upon Defendant Red Oak Capital GP, LLC served on 12/27/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Red Oak Capital GP. LLC in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (King, Robert) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Giovanni James, upon Defendant Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC served on 12/27/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (King, Robert) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Giovanni James, upon Defendant Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC served on 12/22/2022, answer due 1/12/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (King, Robert) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Giovanni James, upon Defendant Insperity PEO Services, L.P. served on 12/14/2022, answer due 1/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Insperity PEO Services, L.P. in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (King, Robert) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Giovanni James, upon Defendant Gary Bechtel served on 12/14/2022, answer due 1/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gary Bechtel, CEO in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (King, Robert) |
Filing 11 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Gary Bechtel, Insperity PEO Services, L.P., Red Oak Capital Financial, LLC, Red Oak Capital GP, LLC, Red Oak Capital Group, LLC, Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC. (rolm) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-02202 FWS(DFMx). (rn) |
Filing 8 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c. (King, Robert) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 filed by James Giovanni Giovanni James. (King, Robert) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by James Giovanni James Giovanni, identifying Red Oak Capital Holdings, LLC. (King, Robert) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by James Giovanni James Giovanni. (King, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Giovanni. (King, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34440636 - Fee: $402, filed by Giovanni James James Giovanni. (Attorney Robert J King added to party James Giovanni(pty:pla))(King, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.