Owens D. Kelly v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Owens D. Kelly |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, The California Board of Prison Terms, BPH and Governors Review |
8:2022cv02203 |
December 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fred W Slaughter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Letter from Owens D Kelly. (jp) |
Filing 8 Letter from Owens D Kelly. (jp) |
Filing 7 Letter from Plaintiff Owens D Kelly. (lom) |
Filing 6 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Owens D. Kelly. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants BPH, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Governors Review, The California Board of Prison Terms.Case assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 402:PAID), filed by plaintiff Owens D. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.