Ying Deng v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
| Ying Deng |
| Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ted H. Kim and David M. Radel |
| 8:2022cv02289 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were CERTIFIED MAILED executed upon the United States Attorneys Office; The Attorney Generals Office; The officer agency or corporation with statute not specified. No RETURNED receipt from defendants attached. (lom) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE on an Agency or Corporation of the United States Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to none. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail receipt attached. There are no boxes checked/unable to verify. No RETURN receipts. (twdb) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Defendant Ted H. Kim Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail receipt attached. (twdb) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Alejandro Mayorkas Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail receipt attached. (twdb) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint. Executed upon David M. Radel, served upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to not indicated. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail receipt attached. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE on an Agency or Corporation of The United States Executed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, upon Defendant Ted H. Kim served on 1/6/2023, answer due 3/7/2023; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 1/6/2023, answer due 3/7/2023; David M. Radel served on 1/6/2023, answer due 3/7/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by mailing a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mailed to the defendants. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-02289 DOC(ADSx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ying Deng, (lh) |
| Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (lh) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Ted H. Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Ted H. Kim, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Filing Fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Ying Deng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
