Technology In Ariscale, LLC v. Razer USA Ltd.
Technology in Ariscale, LLC |
Razer USA Ltd. and Razer USA, LTD. |
8:2022cv02310 |
December 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Razer USA, LTD. answer now due 2/23/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Razer USA, LTD..(Attorney Christopher Kao added to party Razer USA, LTD.(pty:dft))(Kao, Christopher) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC, upon Defendant Razer USA, LTD. served on 1/3/2023, answer due 1/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos "Doe" - Employee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
Filing 12 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC. (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Razer USA, LTD. (lh) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC, (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #3 filed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC. (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Technology in Ariscale, LLC. (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC. (Kasparek, Kyle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34525937 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Technology in Ariscale, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - US Patent No. 8,139,652, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Razer's Accused Products) (Attorney Kyle C. Kasparek added to party Technology in Ariscale, LLC(pty:pla))(Kasparek, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.