Nour Date Company, Inc. v. Royal Palm General Trading LLC et al
| NOUR DATE COMPANY, INC. |
| ROYAL PALM GENERAL TRADING L.L.C., SAFE FOOD CORPORATION, Royal Palm General Trading LLC, DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Royal Dates Factory, LLC, Royal Comfort Trading FZCO and Royal Palm Group |
| 8:2022cv02321 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Text Only ORDER GRANTING Application of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa A. Ferrari to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Safe Food Corporation #15 pursuant to the Courts directive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa A. Ferrari to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Safe Food Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34753195) filed by Defendant Safe Food Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Attorney Megan Rae Peitzke added to party Safe Food Corporation(pty:dft)) (Peitzke, Megan) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nour Date Company, Inc., (White, Clifford) |
| Filing 13 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Nour Date Company, Inc.. (White, Clifford) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #10 as to Defendants Royal Comfort Trading FZCO, Royal Dates Factory, LLC, Royal Palm General Trading LLC, Royal Palm Group, Safe Food Corporation. (jp) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #10 filed by Plaintiff Nour Date Company, Inc.. (White, Clifford) |
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Royal Palm General Trading LLC, Safe Food Corporation, Royal Dates Factory, LLC, Royal Comfort Trading FZCO, Royal Palm Group amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Nour Date Company, Inc.(White, Clifford) |
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Royal Palm General Trading LLC, Safe Food Corporation. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NOUR DATE COMPANY, INC., (White, Clifford) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff NOUR DATE COMPANY, INC.. (White, Clifford) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34539559 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff NOUR DATE COMPANY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Clifford L White added to party NOUR DATE COMPANY, INC.(pty:pla))(White, Clifford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
