Nvidia Corporation et al v. Vineer Bhansali
Petitioner: Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia Singapore PTE. LTD and Nvidia International, Inc.
Respondent: Vineer Bhansali
Case Number: 8:2022mc00015
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CLOSING ACTION by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: In light of the Notice of Withdrawal of Defendants' Motion to Compel Testimony of Third Party Vineer Bhansali #9 , the Court CLOSES this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
September 16, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Movants Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc., Nvidia Singapore PTE. LTD, re Notice of Withdrawal #9 served on September 9, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Thompson, Clayton)
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 Notice of Withdrawal of Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Movants Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc., Nvidia Singapore PTE. LTD. (Thompson, Clayton)
September 9, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Movants Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc., Nvidia Singapore PTE. LTD, re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 NVIDIA's Notice of Motion to Compel Testimony of Third Party Vineer Bhansali; Memo of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Clayton Thompson with Exhibits A-D; and [Proposed] Order served on 09/02/2022. (Thompson, Clayton)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re NVIDIAS NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIMONY OF THIRD PARTY VINEER BHANSALI #1 . The moving party is ordered to file proof of service no later than September 9, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jdo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REFERRING Motion Related to a Subpoena from Another District #1 to Magistrate Judge by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court hereby refers the above captioned action to Magistrate Judge Scott for disposition. (jp)
August 29, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
August 29, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 8:22-mc-00015 FWS (KESx). The previous case number, 8:22-cv-01593, is hereby terminated. (lh)
August 26, 2022 Filing 3 Notice OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by Movants NVIDIA Singapore PTE.Ltd., Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc.. (Thompson, Clayton)
August 26, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Movant NVIDIA Singapore PTE.Ltd., Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc., identifying NVIDIA Corporation. (Thompson, Clayton)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION RELATED TO A SUBPOENA FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-33885433 - Fee: $402, filed by Movants Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia International, Inc., NVIDIA Singapore PTE.Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Clayton Thompson, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Proposed Order) (Attorney Clayton Walter Thompson added to party NVIDIA Singapore PTE.Ltd.(pty:bkmov), Attorney Clayton Walter Thompson added to party Nvidia Corporation(pty:bkmov), Attorney Clayton Walter Thompson added to party Nvidia International, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Thompson, Clayton)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nvidia Corporation et al v. Vineer Bhansali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nvidia Corporation
Represented By: Clayton Walter Thompson
Represented By: Monica Ivana De Lazzari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nvidia Singapore PTE. LTD
Represented By: Clayton Walter Thompson
Represented By: Monica Ivana De Lazzari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nvidia International, Inc.
Represented By: Clayton Walter Thompson
Represented By: Monica Ivana De Lazzari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Vineer Bhansali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?