Longitude Licensing Limited v. Asustek Computer, Inc. et al
LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED |
Asustek Computer, Inc. and Asus Computer International, Inc. |
8:2023cv00033 |
January 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Douglas F McCormick |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION OF DEFENDANT ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR 32-DAY EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #22 by Judge John W. Holcomb. Having considered Asus Computer International, Inc.'s Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, and for good cause appearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants time to respond to Plaintiff's initial Complaint in this matter is hereby EXTENDED to, and including April 10, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) |
Filing 23 OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/10/2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #22 filed by Plaintiff Longitude Licensing Limited. (Kroeger, Paul) |
Filing 22 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/10/2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Asus Computer International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David B. Clark, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order) (Parker, Kenneth) |
Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE filed by Plaintiff Longitude Licensing Limited. (yl) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Asus Computer International, Inc. answer now due 3/9/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Asus Computer International, Inc..(Attorney Kenneth G. Parker added to party Asus Computer International, Inc.(pty:dft))(Parker, Kenneth) |
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Longitude Licensing Limited, upon Defendant Asus Computer International, Inc. served on 1/30/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Silas Man, Shipping and Receiving in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. [Amended] (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Longitude Licensing Limited, upon Defendant Asus Computer International, Inc. served on 1/17/2023, answer due 2/7/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Bobe, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 17 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 16 ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant General Order 21-01. ORDER case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00033-JWH-(DFMx). Signed by Judge Cormac J. Carney and Judge John W. Holcomb. (dve) |
Filing 15 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:22-cv-02312-CJC-(DFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge John D. Early and Judge Fred W. Slaughter to Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00033-CJC-(DFMx). Signed by Judge Cormac J. Carney (dve) |
Filing 14 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Asus Computer International, Inc. (et) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Asustek Computer, Inc. (et) |
Filing 11 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 5 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED, (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED identifying Meridian IP Ireland, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Ledahl, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34584733 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED. (Attorney Brian D Ledahl added to party LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED(pty:pla))(Ledahl, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.