Lisa Ann Verdugo v. SFM, LLC et al
| Lisa Ann Verdugo |
| SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market, SFM, LLC doing business as Sprouts Farmers Market and DOES 1-30 Inclusive |
| 8:2023cv00042 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-00042-FWS (JDEx). (et) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant SFM, LLC (SF MARKETS, LLC dba Sprouts Farmers Market- [ erroneously sued herein as SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market]) (Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Lisa Ann Verdugo in Orange County Superior Court 12/7/2022, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Complaint (filed by Defendant, SF MARKETS, LLC dba SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET (erroneously sued herein as "SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market") filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 5 Notice Request for Judicial Notice filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market. (Defendant, SF MARKETS, LLC dba SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET (erroneously sued herein as "SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market") (Defendant), (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market. (Defendant, SF MARKETS, LLC dba SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET (erroneously sued herein as "SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market ") (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 3 (Defendant, SF MARKETS, LLC dba SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET (erroneously sued herein as "SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market") NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market, (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Baldwin, Rudie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2022-01288481 Receipt No: ACACDC-34592146 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Proof of Service) (Attorney Rudie Dane Baldwin added to party SFM, LLC d.b.a. Sprouts Farmers Market(pty:dft))(Baldwin, Rudie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
