Alejandro Li v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Peipei Li |
| SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 8:2023cv00087 |
| January 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Peipei Li. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Peipei Li, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 1/20/2023, answer due 3/21/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/20/2023, answer due 3/21/2023; Rosemary Langley Melville served on 1/20/2023, answer due 3/21/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00087-FWS-(ADSx). (dve)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Subpoena Request (AO 88), Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Summons Request. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Peipei Li. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Peipei Li, (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST filed as Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by plaintiff Peipei Li., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Peipei Li. (Fan, Zhenxiong) Modified on 1/18/2023 (sh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34623357 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Peipei Li. (Attorney Zhenxiong Fan added to party Peipei Li(pty:pla))(Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
