Johnny Owens v. County of Orange et al
| Johnny Owens |
| County of Orange, Don Barnes, Unknown Named Orange County Jail OCJ Agent No. 1, Unknown Named OCJ Agent No. 2 and Lieutenant Olukoju |
| 8:2023cv00155 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Johnny Owens. (et) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Don Barnes, County of Orange, Olukoju, Unknown Named OCJ Agent No. 2, Unknown Named Orange County Jail OCJ Agent No. 1 pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick., filed by Plaintiff Johnny Owens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Defendant County of Orange, #3 Summons for Defendant Don Barnes, #4 Summons for Defendant Lt Olukoju) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
