Saravenaz Safai et al. v. Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. et al
| Saravenaz Safai |
| Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB and DOES 1-50, inclusive |
| 8:2023cv00165 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Eastern District of Michigan, 2:23-cv-10241 filed 1/31/2023. (rolm) |
Filing 10
ORDER Granting Joint Stipulation #9 to Transfer Venue to the Eastern District of Michigan and to Toll and Extend Flagstar's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Judge David O. Carter. Case Electronically Sent. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Transfer Case to Eastern District Of Michigan And To Toll And Extend Flagstar's Deadline To Respond To Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by defendants Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Van Ness, Caroline) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendants Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB, re Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice (Other) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 Proofs Of Service Of Notice To Adverse Party And Clerk Of The State Court Of Removal Of Action To Federal Court; And Notice Of Removal Of Action To Federal Court And Initial Case Documents served on January 26, 2023. (Van Ness, Caroline) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Saravenaz Safai et al in Orange County Superior Court on 10/26/2022, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Notice Of Pendency Of Other Actions Or Proceedings Pursuant To Civ. Local R. 83-1.4 and Exhibit 1 filed by defendants Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB. (Van Ness, Caroline) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT And Notice Of Interested Parties Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and L.R. 7.1-1 filed by Defendants Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB identifying New York Community Bancorp, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Van Ness, Caroline) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Flagstar Bancorp, Inc., Flagstar Bank, FSB. (Van Ness, Caroline) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 302022-01266908-CU-NP-CXC Receipt No: ACACDC-34691062 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Flagstar Bank, FSB, Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - 2022.08.23 Minute Order, #3 Exhibit C - First Amended Class Action Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Case Management Order, #5 Exhibit E - 2022.11.01 Status Conference Continued, #6 Exhibit F- Summons and Initiating State Court documents, #7 Declaration of William E. Ridgway and Exhibits 1-3) (Attorney Caroline Williams Van Ness added to party Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Caroline Williams Van Ness added to party Flagstar Bank, FSB(pty:dft))(Van Ness, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
