Ruth Martin v. Doctor's Best, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ruth Martin
Defendant: Doctor's Best, Inc. and Doctors Best Inc.
Case Number: 8:2023cv00378
Filed: March 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2023 Filing 14 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 filed by Defendant Doctors Best Inc.. (Simonsen, Ashley)
April 20, 2023 Filing 13 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Ferrell, #2 Exhibit 1 to Dec of S. Ferrell, #3 Exhibit 2 to Dec of S. Ferrell, #4 Exhibit 3 to Dec of S. Ferrell)(Ferrell, Scott)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 5/25/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
March 31, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Doctors Best Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/11/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Ashley M. Simonsen, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Proposed Order Granting Request for Judicial Notice, #12 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Simonsen, Ashley)
March 15, 2023 Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin(Ferrell, Scott)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #8 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter, the court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on or before March 17, 2023. 2. The March 18, 2023, deadline for Defendant to respond to the initial Complaint is VACATED. 3. The deadline for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the FAC in the above-captioned matter is March 31, 2023, or fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff files the FAC, whichever is later. (es)
March 13, 2023 Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend filed by Defendant Doctors Best Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Simonsen, Ashley)
March 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
March 7, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
March 7, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
March 7, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (sh)
March 3, 2023 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendant Doctors Best Inc., filed by Plaintiff Ruth Martin.[FILED IN STATE COURT 01/20/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT B TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)
March 3, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Doctor's Best, Inc., identifying Ruth Martin, Pacific Trial Attorneys, Members of Putative Class, Doctor's Best, Inc., Herman Zhang, KUC Holding, Kingdomway USA Corp., Xiamen Kingdomway Group. (Simonsen, Ashley)
March 3, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Doctor's Best, Inc.. (Simonsen, Ashley)
March 3, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01302828-CU-MT-CXC with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 03/03/2023, receipt number 34896002), filed by Defendant Doctor's Best, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Summons, #5 Exhibit E - Stip. to Extend Time to Respond to Compl, #6 Exhibit F - Stipulation Proof of Service, #7 Exhibit G - Notice & Acknowledgment, #8 Exhibit H - Order to Extend Time to Respond to Compl, #9 Proof of Service) (Attorney Ashley Margaret Simonsen added to party Doctor's Best, Inc.(pty:dft))(Simonsen, Ashley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruth Martin v. Doctor's Best, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth Martin
Represented By: Victoria C. Knowles
Represented By: Scott J Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor's Best, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Margaret Simonsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctors Best Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Margaret Simonsen
Represented By: Zachary Reed Glasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?