Michael C. Keo v. Ronald W. Rose
| Michael C. Keo |
| Ronald W. Rose |
| 8:2023cv00413 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court, having been notified by the plaintiff that this action has been settled #12 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/28/2023. (twdb)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement of Entire Action filed by plaintiff Michael C. Keo. (Tsao, Pamela) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re: PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael C. Keo, upon Defendant Ronald W. Rose served on 3/22/2023, answer due 4/12/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Razan Handal - accounting assistant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ronald W. Rose. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Michael C. Keo. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Michael C. Keo, (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael C. Keo. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34918650 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Michael C. Keo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party Michael C. Keo(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael C. Keo v. Ronald W. Rose | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael C. Keo | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Tsao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ronald W. Rose | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
