Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney v. State of California et al
| Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney |
| State of California, Victor Acevedo, Devon Ramos, Daniel Singer, Louis Amaya and David W. Slayton |
| 8:2023cv00479 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #20 . The Anti-Injunction Act thus prohibits the Court from granting Plaintiff her requested relief. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Petition is DENIED. (lc) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney, re 1. VERIFIED COMPLAINT (AMENDED) 2. PROPOSED ORDER ON VERIFIED COMPLAINT (AMENDED) 3. PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL #18 served on 5/8/23. (hr) |
| Filing 20 VERIFIED PETITION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (kh) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties for Amended Verified Complaint filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (kh) |
| Filing 18 VERIFIED COMPLAINT (AMENDED) against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint #1 filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (kh) |
Filing 17
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: The Court finds Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re State of California #14 appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 10, 2023 is removed from the Court's calendar and no appearance is required. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 16 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS #14 filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (kh) |
| Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: A motion has been filed in this case #14 . The parties are required to review Judge Spaeth's procedures page, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-autumn-d-spaeth, for important procedures regarding motions and mandatory chambers copies. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant State of California. Motion set for hearing on 5/10/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Sullinger, Shirley) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant State of California. Motion set for hearing on 5/15/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Shirley R Sullinger added to party State of California(pty:dft)) (Sullinger, Shirley) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND FILING REQUIREMENTS AFTER FILING OF COMPLAINT BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Plaintiff is responsible for ensuring that service of the summons and complaint complies with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Within ninety (90) days of filing the complaint, Plaintiff shall file Proof(s) of Service reflecting service upon each defendant. **See Order for details** (kh)
|
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant State of California. (hr) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant David W. Slayton. (hr) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Victor Acevedo. (hr) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Louis Amaya. (hr) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Daniel Singer. (hr) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Devon Ramos. (hr) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO E-FILE by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, is reminded that she must comply with the Local Rules, including all rules regarding electronic filing. Plaintiff must also (1) register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five days of being served with the instant order; and (2) if Plaintiff does not already have a PACER account, she must establish one within the same five-day period. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Electronic Filing web page located on the Court's website at http://www.cacd.uscourts. gov/e-filing/pro-se-electronic-filing. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Victor Acevedo, Louis Amaya, Devon Ramos, Daniel Singer, David W. Slayton, State of California Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Filing Fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Kawanna-Shawntaye Gritney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request, #4 Summons Request, #5 Summons Request, #6 Summons Request, #7 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
