VIZIO, Inc. v. Dedicated Logistics, LLC et al
Plaintiff: VIZIO, Inc.
Defendant: Dedicated Logistics, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Dedicated Logistics Services LLC
Case Number: 8:2023cv00519
Filed: March 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2023 Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #14 as to Defendant Dedicated Logistics Services LLC. (jp)
May 12, 2023 Filing 16 Plaintiff VIZIO, INC.'s Amended NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc., identifying VIZIO, Inc.. (Shaw, Brian)
May 12, 2023 Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc.. (Shaw, Brian)
May 12, 2023 Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc.(Shaw, Brian)
April 7, 2023 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Dedicated Logistics, LLC answer now due 5/12/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Dedicated Logistics, LLC.(Attorney Kathleen Collins Jeffries added to party Dedicated Logistics, LLC(pty:dft))(Jeffries, Kathleen)
April 6, 2023 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc., upon Defendant Dedicated Logistics, LLC served on 3/28/2023, answer due 4/18/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Dedicated Logistics, LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Shaw, Brian)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
March 23, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4. The correct event are Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71), Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, and Summons Request. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Dedicated Logistics, LLC. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh)
March 22, 2023 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #4 filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc.. (Fraidenburgh, Paul)
March 22, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE and Notice of Interested Parties filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 03/22/2023, receipt number 35004111), filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc..(Fraidenburgh, Paul)
March 22, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 03/22/2023, receipt number 35004111), filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc..(Fraidenburgh, Paul)
March 22, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 03/22/2023, receipt number 35004111), filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc. (Fraidenburgh, Paul)
March 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35004111 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff VIZIO, Inc.. (Attorney Paul J Fraidenburgh added to party VIZIO, Inc.(pty:pla))(Fraidenburgh, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VIZIO, Inc. v. Dedicated Logistics, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VIZIO, Inc.
Represented By: Paul J Fraidenburgh
Represented By: Brian Robert Satter Shaw
Represented By: Matthew Thomas Drenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dedicated Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Kathleen Collins Jeffries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dedicated Logistics Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?