Margarita Munoz et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2023cv00532
Filed: March 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTES SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and the parties' submissions pursuant to FRCP 26(f), VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2023, and sets the following schedule: Jury Trial set for 5/21/2024 at 8:30 AM. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 5/2/2024 at 8:30 AM. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties: 10/5/2023. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 11/2/2023. Last Date to Hear Motions: 2/8/2024. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference: 2/22/2024. Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders: 4/11/2024. Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order: 4/18/2024. (See document for further information). (jp)
May 18, 2023 Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz.. (Shippen-Murray, Brian)
April 19, 2023 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., (Richardson, Jason)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
April 17, 2023 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Margarita Munoz, Francisco Munoz, upon Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. served on 3/27/2023, answer due 4/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Daghighian, Sepehr)
April 17, 2023 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc..(Attorney Jason M Richardson added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Richardson, Jason)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
March 23, 2023 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (lom)
March 23, 2023 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr)
March 23, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh)
March 23, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Brian T. Shippen-Murray as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Shippen-Murray, Brian)
March 23, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael H Rosenstein counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Michael H. Rosenstein as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Rosenstein, Michael)
March 23, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz, identifying Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Rosenstein, Michael)
March 23, 2023 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sepehr Daghighian counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Sepehr Daghighian as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr)
March 23, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr)
March 23, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr)
March 23, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35012102 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz, Francisco Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Daghighian, Sepehr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Margarita Munoz et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margarita Munoz
Represented By: Sepehr Daghighian
Represented By: Brian Tate Shippen-Murray
Represented By: Michael H Rosenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Munoz
Represented By: Sepehr Daghighian
Represented By: Brian Tate Shippen-Murray
Represented By: Michael H Rosenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Represented By: Jason M Richardson
Represented By: Petra Fakhouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?