Margarita Munoz et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz |
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
8:2023cv00532 |
March 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Fred W Slaughter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MINUTES SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and the parties' submissions pursuant to FRCP 26(f), VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2023, and sets the following schedule: Jury Trial set for 5/21/2024 at 8:30 AM. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 5/2/2024 at 8:30 AM. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties: 10/5/2023. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 11/2/2023. Last Date to Hear Motions: 2/8/2024. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference: 2/22/2024. Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders: 4/11/2024. Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order: 4/18/2024. (See document for further information). (jp) |
Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz.. (Shippen-Murray, Brian) |
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., (Richardson, Jason) |
Filing 17 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Margarita Munoz, Francisco Munoz, upon Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. served on 3/27/2023, answer due 4/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc..(Attorney Jason M Richardson added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Richardson, Jason) |
Filing 14 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (lom) |
Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Brian T. Shippen-Murray as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Shippen-Murray, Brian) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael H Rosenstein counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Michael H. Rosenstein as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz, identifying Nissan North America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sepehr Daghighian counsel for Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. Adding Sepehr Daghighian as counsel of record for Plaintiffs for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz and Francisco Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Francisco Munoz, Margarita Munoz. (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35012102 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Margarita Munoz, Francisco Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Francisco Munoz(pty:pla), Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Margarita Munoz(pty:pla))(Daghighian, Sepehr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.