Amber Sharp v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
Amber Sharp |
Amazon.com Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Amazon.com, a Delaware corporation, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
8:2023cv00546 |
March 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Karen E Scott |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court. (twdb) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter, ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of Orange County, California. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. Case number 30-2023- 01306911-CU-OE-CJC. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Zane Brown re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Declaration of Zane Brown in Support of Notice of Removal of Action filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Lamar, Karimah) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. Submitted with Attachment 6 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Amber Sharp pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Amazon.com without prejudice. Court on 3/17/2021 Submitted with Attachment 5 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Amazon.com, Amazon.com Services LLC, Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Amber Sharp. Filed in State Court on 2/9/2023 Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC, re Declaration #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 03/24/2023. (Lamar, Karimah) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement [Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1; L.R. 7.1-1] filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC identifying Amazon.com, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Lamar, Karimah) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Karimah J. Lamar re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Declaration of Karimah J. Lamar in Support of Notice of Removal of Action filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Lamar, Karimah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Lamar, Karimah) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01306911-CU-OE-CTL Receipt No: ACACDC-35022036 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Complaint, #4 Notice of Hearing, #5 Request for Dismissal, #6 Answer to Complaint, #7 Proof of Service) (Attorney Karimah J Lamar added to party Amazon.com Services LLC(pty:dft))(Lamar, Karimah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.