Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava v. Superior Court of Orange County
Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava |
Superior Court of Orange County |
8:2023cv00602 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, Related to: Order #7 . Pursuant to the Court's Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as Duplicative, the Court adjudges the Petition denied and the case is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
![]() |
Filing 6 AMENDED NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00602-DMG-ADS. (aco) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava. (jtil) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava. The Petitioner does not consent. (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava v. Superior Court of Orange County | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Sebastian Bogdan Dumbrava | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Superior Court of Orange County | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.