Jacob Grisel v. Wesco Distribution, Inc. et al
| Jacob Grisel |
| Wesco Distribution Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive |
| 8:2023cv00651 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan & SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES WORKSHEET ; estimated length of trial 4-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Jacob Grisel.. (Jaurigue, Michael) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The parties are ordered to re-file their Joint 26(f) Report and include a completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet, available on the Judge's Procedures and Schedules webpage. Counsel shall file the amended joint report no later than June 7, 2023, to include the complete Schedule. The parties are also directed to review the Standing Order Setting Schedule Conference on the Judge's Procedures and Schedules webpage for instructions on filing and submitting the Joint 26(f) Report and Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet. The Court VACATES the June 12, 2023, Scheduling Conference. Civil Trial Order to Issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Report ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution Inc... (Coulter, John) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-040) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Wesley L. Hsu, this case is transferred from Judge David O. Carter to the calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00651 WLH(JDEx). (rn)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution Inc., re Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form, #7 , Declaration #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #12 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #10 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #9 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #11 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #5 , Declaration #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #8 served on April 18, 2023. (Coulter, John) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 6/12/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (kdu)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:23-cv-00651 DOC (JDEx). (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jacob Grisel, upon Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc. served on 3/14/2023. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned.[FILED IN STATE COURT 03/15/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHED TO DECLARATION OF JOHN COULTRE EXHIBIT C #6 ] (sh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT INDICATED SUBMITTED AS ATTACHED TO DECLARATION OF JOHN COUTLRE EXHIBIT D #6 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Wesco Distribution, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jacob Grisel.[FILED IN STATE COURT 03/03/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHED TO DECLARATION OF JOHN GREG COULTRE EXHIBIT A #6 ] |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of John Greg Coulter re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc.. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc., (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Molly Gardner re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc.. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc.. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01311365-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-35136593 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Wesco Distribution, Inc.. (Attorney John Greg Coulter added to party Wesco Distribution, Inc.(pty:dft))(Coulter, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
