BTL Industries, Inc. v. Beauty Works OC LLC et al
BTL Industries, Inc. |
Beauty Works OC LLC, d/b/a Newport Peaches Inc., Snezhana Kurkina, Beauty Works OC LLC doing business as Newport Peaches Inc., Newport Peaches Inc. and Does 1 - 10 inclusive |
8:2023cv00654 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
James V Selna |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Beauty Works OC LLC served on 6/2/2023, answer due 6/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jasmine Aldana, authorized employee of Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Snezhana Kurkina served on 4/28/2023, answer due 5/19/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brenda Burk, authorized to accept service for Snezhana Kurkina at business location in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., upon Defendant Newport Peaches Inc. served on 4/28/2023, answer due 5/19/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brenda Burk, person in charge of the business in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney John W. Stevens on behalf of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt) |
Filing 24 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE #23 by Judge James V. Selna: Granting #23 Non-Resident Attorney Seth R. Ogden APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc, designating Randy R. Haj as local counsel. (es) |
Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Seth R. Ogden to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35200849) filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 22 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (eva) |
Filing 21 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 as to Defendant Snezhana Kurkina. (es) |
Filing 20 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 as to Defendant Newport Peaches Inc.. (es) Modified on 4/19/2023 (es). |
Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 as to Defendant Beauty Works OC LLC. (es) |
Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #15 filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 15 First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Trademark Infringement, and Unfair Competition; Demand for Jury Trial AMENDED COMPLAINT against Beauty Works OC LLC; Newport Peaches Inc; and Snezhana Kurkina All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Haj, Randy) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney John W Stevens for the Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Seth R Ogden for the Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Beauty Works OC LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Snezhana Kurkina. (ghap) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Haj, Randy) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc., identifying BTL Industries, Inc., and BTL Holdings Limited. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Haj, Randy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35141814 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.. (Attorney Randy R. Haj added to party BTL Industries, Inc.(pty:pla))(Haj, Randy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.