Nina Tran v. County of Orange et al
| Nina Tran |
| County of Orange, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Social Services Agency, Tran Nguyen and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2023cv00681 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 Days, filed by Defendant County of Orange.. (Peterson, Amanda) |
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting Request to Strike Punitive Damages From Plaintiff's Complaint #14 . (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Order , REQUEST to Strike PUNITIVE DAMAGES FROM PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Stipulation to Strike #11 filed by Defendant County of Orange. (Peterson, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on June 29, 2023. (rrp) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant County of Orange.(Peterson, Amanda) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Strike filed by Defendant County of Orange.(Peterson, Amanda) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by NINA TRAN Nina Tran, identifying COUNTY OF ORANGE. (Zambrano, Ronald) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Orange, (Peterson, Amanda) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #3 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Orange, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Social Services Agency. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Nina Tran. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/13/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #3 ]. **Defendant Tran Nguyen deleted from the docket due to clerical error per Notice of Errata #2 . (et) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant County of Orange. (Schwartz, Zachary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01312967-CU-OE-CJC with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 04/19/2023, receipt number ACACDC-35165654), filed by Defendant County of Orange. (Attorney Zachary M. Schwartz added to party County of Orange(pty:dft))(Schwartz, Zachary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant County of Orange. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Schwartz, Zachary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01312967-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-35165654 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Tran Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Zachary M. Schwartz added to party Tran Nguyen(pty:dft))(Schwartz, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
