GS Holistic, LLC v. Maya and Jill, Inc. et al
| GS Holistic, LLC |
| Maya and Jill, Inc. doing business as TheGShop and Kamleshkumar Patel |
| 8:2023cv00775 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Karen E Scott |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: On June 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Request for Clerk to Enter Default #12 . Default was subsequently entered. In light of the entry of default as to all defendants, *Plaintiff shall file an appropriate Motion for Default Judgment no later than July 20, 2023.* THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 13
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 12 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Maya and Jill, Inc., doing business as TheGShop, Kamleshkumar Patel (bm) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-00775 FWS(JDEx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Maya and Jill, Inc. filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, upon Defendant Maya and Jill, Inc. served on 5/9/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tarek Alfarrouit who identified themselves as the Person Authorized to Accept with identity confirmed by subject stating their name. The individual accepted service with direct delivery. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kamleshkumar Patel. (et) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maya and Jill, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Remaining Summons)(Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, identifying Chris Folkerts, GS Holistic, LLC, Leon Law LLP, Tomas Carlos Leon, MAYA & JILL, INC. d/b/a THEGSHOP and KAMLESHKUMAR PATEL. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35251250 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Attorney Tomas Carlos Leon added to party GS Holistic, LLC(pty:pla))(Leon, Tomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
