David Robinson et al v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
David Robinson and Nina Robinson |
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Quest Diagnostics and DOES 1 through 15, inclusive |
8:2023cv00803 |
May 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
John W Holcomb |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early re Stipulation for Protective Order #14 . (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated.(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiffs David Robinson, Nina Robinson(Vanderwoude, Vikki) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 15(a) #9 by Judge John W. Holcomb. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint to dismiss without prejudice the Third Cause of Action for Medical Battery. Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Complaint by June 2, 2023. (rolm) |
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Quest Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proof of Service)(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT [FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1(a)(2)] filed by Plaintiffs David Robinson, Nina Robinson (Vanderwoude, Vikki) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:23-cv-00803 JWH (JDEx). (jtil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, case number 30-2023-01315380-CU-MM-CJC Receipt No: BCACDC-35264211 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 5, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT 6, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Notice of Interested Parties, #10 Declaration, #11 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Craig T Mann added to party Quest Diagnostics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Mann, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.