Steve Grand v. Alastair Borthwick
| Steve Grand |
| Alastair Borthwick |
| 8:2023cv00894 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #9 Defendant's Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss (Dkt. 9) and Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Against Defendant With Prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on July 27, 2023. (rrp) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Alastair Borthwick. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Crittenden, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 23-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:23-cv-00890 CJC(KESx). Case transferred from Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:23-cv-00894 CJC(KESx). Signed by Judge Cormac J. Carney (rn)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Alastair Borthwick. (Crittenden, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Alastair Borthwick. Related Case(s): 8:23-cv-00890; 8:23-cv-00891; 8:23-cv-00892; 8:23-cv-00893; 8:23-cv-00894 (Crittenden, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Alastair Borthwick. (Crittenden, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California - County of Orange - Small Claims Court, case number 30-2023-01320193 with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 05/19/2023, receipt number 7120901), filed by Defendant Alastair Borthwick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Signed Application, #5 Declaration) (Attorney Joseph M Crittenden added to party Alastair Borthwick(pty:dft))(Crittenden, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steve Grand v. Alastair Borthwick | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve Grand | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alastair Borthwick | |
| Represented By: | Joseph M Crittenden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
