Nora Mansour v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. et al
Nora Mansour |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
8:2023cv01049 |
June 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Fred W Slaughter |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER ON PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES (CIVIL CASES) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 12 MINUTES SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, having reviewed the pleadings and the parties' submissions pursuant to FRCP 26(f), VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 8/17/2023, and sets the following schedule: Jury Trial set for 8/27/2024 at 8:30 AM. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 8/15/2024 at 8:30 AM. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties: 2/15/2024. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 2/15/2024. Last Date to Hear Motions: 5/23/2024. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference: 6/6/2024. Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders: 7/25/2024. Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order: 8/1/2024. (See document for further information). (jp) |
Filing 11 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. (Mann, Craig) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 8/17/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc..(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
Filing 4 Notice Defendant's Notice to Adverse Party of Removal of Action to Federal Court filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics. (Mann, Craig) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, (Attachments: #1 Supplement (Certificate of Service Re Certification and Notice of Interested Parties))(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics. (Attachments: #1 Supplement (Certificate of Serve Re Civil Cover Sheet))(Mann, Craig) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01323547-CU-MM-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-35494538 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics. (Attachments: #1 Declaration (Declaration of Craig C. Mann in Support of Removal), #2 Declaration (Declaration of Dawn M. Leahy in Support of Removal)) (Attorney Craig T Mann added to party Quest Diagnostics(pty:dft))(Mann, Craig) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Nora Mansour. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Nora Mansour, upon Defendant Quest Diagnostics served on 5/15/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/18/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.