Tu Phuong Liem v. Ur M. Jaddou et al
| Tu Phuong Liem |
| UR M JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alissa L. Emmel, MERRICK GARLAND, E. MARTIN ESTRADA and Ur M. Jaddou |
| 8:2023cv01108 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem, upon Defendant Alissa L. Emmel served on 7/12/2023, answer due 9/11/2023; Merrick Garland served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 6/29/2023, answer due 8/28/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 6/29/2023, answer due 8/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Espinosa, Lindsey) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem, upon Defendant E. Martin Estrada served on 6/28/2023, answer due 8/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Jane Doe (refused to state full name), Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Espinosa, Lindsey) |
| Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem, identifying HY Manhattan Tower A-3 LLC. (Espinosa, Lindsey) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant E. Martin Estrada. (et) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (et) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alissa L. Emmel. (et) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (et) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Summons for Alissa L. Emmel, #3 Summons for Merrick Garland, #4 Summons for E. Martin Estrada)(Espinosa, Lindsey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem. (Espinosa, Lindsey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35528500 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Tu Phuong Liem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L) (Attorney Lindsey Michelle Espinosa added to party Tu Phuong Liem(pty:pla))(Espinosa, Lindsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
