Public Storage v. Charles D. Burrus Family Trust
| Public Storage |
| Charles D. Burrus Family Trust doing business as Mini Public Storage |
| 8:2023cv01190 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 9/28/2023 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RESETTING Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case 15 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court, on its own motion, hereby RESETS Defendant's Motion Dismiss Case #9 to 9/28/2023 at 10:00 AM. The hearing shall proceed in person as to all parties. The Court shall issue a separate Order Setting Scheduling Conference forthwith. (jp)
|
|
Filing 12
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:23-cv-01190 FWS(DFMx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Public Storage. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant Charles D. Burrus Family Trust. Motion set for hearing on 8/29/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Exhibit 1-3, #3 Declaration of Benjamin Wells) (Attorney Mandana Jafarinejad added to party Charles D. Burrus Family Trust(pty:dft)) (Jafarinejad, Mandana) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Public Storage, upon Defendant Charles D. Burrus Family Trust served on 7/6/2023, answer due 7/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeff Melton, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Charles D. Burrus Family Trust. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Public Storage. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Public Storage, identifying The Vanguard Group, Inc., Shareholder owning approximately 10% of common stock of Public Storage. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Public Storage. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Public Storage. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35597631 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Public Storage. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-9) (Attorney Hans Linden Mayer added to party Public Storage(pty:pla))(Mayer, Hans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
