George Lugo v. City of Dana Point et al
George Alexander Lugo |
City of Dana Point, Marina Inn, Starbucks, Bear Coast Coffee, Dana Point Police, Officer Briseno, Officer Choi, Officer Hodges, Nick Cetrangelo, Tony Mangucci, Doe and Jane Doe |
8:2023cv01237 |
July 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Douglas F McCormick |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (yl) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (lh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo, (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Bear Coast Coffee, Briseno, Nick Cetrangelo, Choi, City of Dana Point, Dana Point Police, Doe, Jane Doe, Hodges, Tony Mangucci, Marina Inn, Starbucks Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Filed by Plaintiff George Alexander Lugo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.