Brandon Christopher Williams v. Jenkins
Petitioner: Brandon Christopher Williams and Brandon Williams
Respondent: Warden Jenkins
Case Number: 8:2023cv01264
Filed: July 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2023 Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Brandon Christopher Williams, BK No. 87152509, Metropolitan Detention Center, PO Box 531500, Los Angeles, CA 90053 re Order on Motion for Enlargement of Time to File. #12 (vmun)
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: Respondent's #11 for an extension of time to file a response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. The response shall be due on or before September 21, 2023. (es)
August 1, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by respondent Jenkins. (Beesley, Christopher)
July 28, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
July 25, 2023 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christopher P Beesley counsel for Respondent Jenkins. Adding Christopher Pratt Beesley as counsel of record for Jenkins, Warden for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondent Jenkins, Warden. (Attorney Christopher P Beesley added to party Jenkins(pty:res))(Beesley, Christopher)
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #4 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Request is GRANTED. (iv)
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Respondent's attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND DEADLINES.] (es)
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within twenty-three (23) days of the date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 2, #2 Attachment 2 of 2) (es)
July 14, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et)
July 12, 2023 Filing 4 DECLARATION in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Brandon Christopher Williams. (et)
July 12, 2023 Filing 3 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Brandon Christopher Williams. (et)
July 12, 2023 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Brandon Christopher Williams. (et)
July 12, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by Petitioner Brandon Christopher Williams. (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandon Christopher Williams v. Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandon Christopher Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandon Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Jenkins
Represented By: Christopher P Beesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?